Base
Full Name | musabtr1 |
Organization | TR |
Job Title | FI |
Country |
Forum Replies Created
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
Can I get More Details about the topic
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
I face a problem to control both dimensions in X and Y axises. Once I obtain a guideline for Z direction. Is there anyway to control the parameters with parallel changes.
Control Wavelength with Waveguide dimensions opens the gate for more challenges.
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
Dear Damian,
using the parameter sweep for one parameter would be great for wavelength. I am trying to control two parameters, which is related to Design geometries. I hope to make it in a perfect way.
Thanks for your valueable time.
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
Hi Damian,
Simulation is working properly in 32-bit format. I hope to solve this problem soon in version 13. We are looking to utilize 64-bit for accurate and fast results.
Thanks for your Time.
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
I solved the problem by switching to 32bit version. I will upload the snapshot of the problem once I arrive the office.
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
I hope to get more details.
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
Thanks a lot Damian,
I am trying to solve a set of waveguide dimensions, is there any possible way to involve the polarization effect in the group index.
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
Damian Mark,
right now, I’m using mode solver. can I measure polarization and group index for my Design.
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
Dear Alvin,
The FD more accurate for the small geometries less than 2 micrometre, due to concentrating of the mesh in a small scale that’s why the results become more accurate. for your case I suggest to used the FD mode.
Make sure that you are using the PML to obtain the accurate values.
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
is there any online database for polymer optical properties. I appreciate sharing
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
Thanks a lot. During working on the mode solver by using ADI and FD. I found it much better work for small cross section by using the FD ( 500 nm – 900 nm).
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
Hi
you can get the polarization independent by compare the effective index of TM, and TE. so you choose the geometries that have a similar values of the effective index ( TE = TM ).
![Profile Photo](https://optiwave.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/689/ae4c253ef7dfd51584285d6886ad7ba3-bpfull.jpg)
this is the attached file of the problem