- This topic has 16 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 10 months ago by
Dr. Dhiman Kakati.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 29, 2016 at 3:34 am #34067
Sanjeev kumar
ParticipantHello everyone,
I have a very urgent query regarding the response of the BER analyzer as i have seen that whenever we set the bit rate to some optimum level say at 30Gbps the response shown by BER analyzer is very good with Q Factor of 15 and BER of 10^-20 but when i set the bit rate to 28.8 the response goes down with Q Factor only 5 and BER is only 10^-6 what does it means.
Do i have designed a wrong Transmitter?
or there is some parameters that decides the output response?
is there any phase relationship rquired to get the output response?
why system is showing too large output response fluctuation at slight bit rate change … as changing bit rate from 30Gbps to 28.8Gbps is not large but reponse changed too much …where is the discrepency? why it is happening? -
March 29, 2016 at 3:42 am #34069
Sanjeev kumar
ParticipantIs there anyone facing the same problem?
-
March 29, 2016 at 3:53 am #34074
Dr. Dhiman Kakati
ParticipantHello Sanjeev Kumar,
This problem occurs may a times when your system bit rate and symbol rate (that you have taken at the layout properties) do not match with that of your transmitter. try to set prbs generator bit rate in script form and write there Bit rate. I think this should solve your problems. Thanking you.Regards,
Dhiman -
March 29, 2016 at 3:56 am #34075
Sanjeev kumar
ParticipantThanks for your kind feedback sir,
I have already done this but even then the problem exists. i have already learnt this thing. there is some other problem as PRBS bit rate script does not change my results.-
March 29, 2016 at 4:02 am #34076
Dr. Dhiman Kakati
ParticipantHi Sanjeev,
If you have tried this out and still your problem exists, to make any further comment on or solution I need to look into your design, If it is possible please attach the design .osd file here.Regards,
Dhiman
-
-
March 29, 2016 at 4:50 am #34077
Sanjeev kumar
ParticipantAttachment uploaded.
-
March 29, 2016 at 5:35 am #34080
Dr. Dhiman Kakati
ParticipantHi Sanjeev,
I think you have missed the attachment, Please reupload again.Regards,
Dhiman
-
-
March 29, 2016 at 6:21 am #34083
Sanjeev kumar
ParticipantAttachment uploaded now
-
March 29, 2016 at 12:35 pm #34152
Dr. Dhiman Kakati
ParticipantHi Sanjeev Kumar,
I think you have done some major mistakes because you are using continuous phase frequency shift keying (CPFSK) sequence generator as seen from the attached image and applying it to modulate the optical signal using MZM modulator. but at the receiver side you have not done the decoding of the CPFSK sequence. I am not aware of this system. I have to try from my own to have a confirm answer.Regards,
Dhiman -
March 29, 2016 at 11:43 pm #34162
Sanjeev kumar
ParticipantSir there is no decoding available to decode CPFSK data. if u know something about it please guide me.
-
March 30, 2016 at 12:20 am #34165
Dr. Dhiman Kakati
ParticipantHello Sanjeev Kumar,
Yes I agree with you that there is no CPFSK decoder in Optisystem Components library, I did post this issue regarding MSK decoder as MSK is a special kind of CPFSK, in another topic then I was Suggested please have a look to the following links…Regards,
Dhiman
-
-
March 30, 2016 at 2:19 am #34172
him ind
ParticipantHI,
I would like to simulated and learn about the 40 gbps bidirectional transmission (upstream 1550nm downstream 1310nm) system about which video and necessary document is available on optiwave site. I shall be thankful if anyone can share this .osd file with me at himnariyal30@gmail.com.
Thanking you in anticipation. -
March 30, 2016 at 1:35 pm #34188
Naazira Badar
ParticipantHi Sanjeev Kumar
Firstly I surprised that the Q.F and BER performance has deteriorated on reducing the bit rate.Secondly, I think Dhiman has rightly pointed out about the absence of the decoder circuitry at the receiver end.
All the best.
Regards
Naazira -
March 30, 2016 at 3:07 pm #34191
Ranjeet Kumar
ParticipantHi Sanjeev kumar,
I agree with the points of Dhiman kakati that the “problem occurs many a times when system bit rate and symbol rate do not match with that of your transmitter, so we have to set prbs generator bit rate in script form and write there Bit rate”.
I also think that when we design the networks as per our requirements , then we should know the different standard values of corresponding parameters as per ITU- standards.
We should not use random values of different parameters and always follow the standard one.
We could take help from the sample of different designs of optisystem.-
April 1, 2016 at 10:47 am #34301
Dr. Dhiman Kakati
ParticipantI totally agree agree with sanjeev kumar that the system we design must meet the specification or follow ITU standards such as frequency allocation, bandwidth etc.
Regards,
Dhiman
-
-
March 31, 2016 at 2:51 pm #34281
SAHIL SINGH
ParticipantHi Sanjeev kumar,
I agree with the view of Dhiman kakati as well as Ranjeet Kumar that problem many a times is because of the fact that system bit rate and symbol rate do not match with that of your transmitter… Also try using the standard values of different parameters…
Regards
Sahil Singh
-
April 1, 2016 at 10:44 am #34300
Dr. Dhiman Kakati
ParticipantHello Sanjeev Kumar,
Did you checked how much power is arriving at the receiver, The received power also has some deciding criteria, So please let us know how much power you are getting at the input of the system. Thanking you.Regards,
Dhiman
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.