Home Forums SYSTEM BER Analyzer Response at different bit rates

Viewing 12 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #34067
      Sanjeev kumar
      Participant

      Hello everyone,
      I have a very urgent query regarding the response of the BER analyzer as i have seen that whenever we set the bit rate to some optimum level say at 30Gbps the response shown by BER analyzer is very good with Q Factor of 15 and BER of 10^-20 but when i set the bit rate to 28.8 the response goes down with Q Factor only 5 and BER is only 10^-6 what does it means.
      Do i have designed a wrong Transmitter?
      or there is some parameters that decides the output response?
      is there any phase relationship rquired to get the output response?
      why system is showing too large output response fluctuation at slight bit rate change … as changing bit rate from 30Gbps to 28.8Gbps is not large but reponse changed too much …where is the discrepency? why it is happening?

    • #34069
      Sanjeev kumar
      Participant

      Is there anyone facing the same problem?

    • #34074
      Dr. Dhiman Kakati
      Participant

      Hello Sanjeev Kumar,
      This problem occurs may a times when your system bit rate and symbol rate (that you have taken at the layout properties) do not match with that of your transmitter. try to set prbs generator bit rate in script form and write there Bit rate. I think this should solve your problems. Thanking you.

      Regards,
      Dhiman

    • #34075
      Sanjeev kumar
      Participant

      Thanks for your kind feedback sir,
      I have already done this but even then the problem exists. i have already learnt this thing. there is some other problem as PRBS bit rate script does not change my results.

      • #34076
        Dr. Dhiman Kakati
        Participant

        Hi Sanjeev,
        If you have tried this out and still your problem exists, to make any further comment on or solution I need to look into your design, If it is possible please attach the design .osd file here.

        Regards,
        Dhiman

    • #34077
      Sanjeev kumar
      Participant

      Attachment uploaded.

      • #34080
        Dr. Dhiman Kakati
        Participant

        Hi Sanjeev,
        I think you have missed the attachment, Please reupload again.

        Regards,
        Dhiman

    • #34083
      Sanjeev kumar
      Participant

      Attachment uploaded now

      Attachments:
    • #34152
      Dr. Dhiman Kakati
      Participant

      Hi Sanjeev Kumar,
      I think you have done some major mistakes because you are using continuous phase frequency shift keying (CPFSK) sequence generator as seen from the attached image and applying it to modulate the optical signal using MZM modulator. but at the receiver side you have not done the decoding of the CPFSK sequence. I am not aware of this system. I have to try from my own to have a confirm answer.

      Regards,
      Dhiman

    • #34162
      Sanjeev kumar
      Participant

      Sir there is no decoding available to decode CPFSK data. if u know something about it please guide me.

    • #34172
      him ind
      Participant

      HI,
      I would like to simulated and learn about the 40 gbps bidirectional transmission (upstream 1550nm downstream 1310nm) system about which video and necessary document is available on optiwave site. I shall be thankful if anyone can share this .osd file with me at himnariyal30@gmail.com.
      Thanking you in anticipation.

    • #34188
      Naazira Badar
      Participant

      Hi Sanjeev Kumar
      Firstly I surprised that the Q.F and BER performance has deteriorated on reducing the bit rate.

      Secondly, I think Dhiman has rightly pointed out about the absence of the decoder circuitry at the receiver end.

      All the best.

      Regards
      Naazira

    • #34191
      Ranjeet Kumar
      Participant

      Hi Sanjeev kumar,
      I agree with the points of Dhiman kakati that the “problem occurs many a times when system bit rate and symbol rate do not match with that of your transmitter, so we have to set prbs generator bit rate in script form and write there Bit rate”.
      I also think that when we design the networks as per our requirements , then we should know the different standard values of corresponding parameters as per ITU- standards.
      We should not use random values of different parameters and always follow the standard one.
      We could take help from the sample of different designs of optisystem.

      • #34301
        Dr. Dhiman Kakati
        Participant

        I totally agree agree with sanjeev kumar that the system we design must meet the specification or follow ITU standards such as frequency allocation, bandwidth etc.

        Regards,
        Dhiman

    • #34281
      SAHIL SINGH
      Participant

      Hi Sanjeev kumar,

      I agree with the view of Dhiman kakati as well as Ranjeet Kumar that problem many a times is because of the fact that system bit rate and symbol rate do not match with that of your transmitter… Also try using the standard values of different parameters…

      Regards

      Sahil Singh

    • #34300
      Dr. Dhiman Kakati
      Participant

      Hello Sanjeev Kumar,
      Did you checked how much power is arriving at the receiver, The received power also has some deciding criteria, So please let us know how much power you are getting at the input of the system. Thanking you.

      Regards,
      Dhiman

Viewing 12 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.