[MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAParticipant]

hello all

Please need some help. here i attached image of setup file of optisystem 13 by comparison of APD or PIN receiver sensitivity analysis. here I got
for APD received power -28.95 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
for PIN received power -35.45 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)

As per my analysis in above result PIN Receiver showing good sensitivity then APD but most research artical shows APD has good sensitivity then PIN. please verify my statements.

[MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAParticipant]

hello all

Please need some help. here i attached osd file of optisystem 13 by comparison of APD or PIN receiver sensitivity analysis. here I got

for APD received power -28.95 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
for PIN received power -35.45 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)

As per my analysis in above result PIN Receiver showing good sensitivity then APD but most research artical shows APD has good sensitivity then PIN. please verify my statements.

[MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAParticipant]

According ur snapshot data i am getting two different values of Q factor PIN (60.11) or APD (4.71) not same …after changing PRBS sequence 4096. Q factor value should be same …

[MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAParticipant]

can i get evolution licence software till we get upgraded software pack .. @ optiwave technical support

[MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAParticipant]

can i upgrade from optiwave website

[MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAParticipant]

till now our institute didnt receive the latest version. we already recevied mail that it is dispatched …form side of optiwave

[MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAParticipant]

this file is not open in optisystem 13. please suggest any idea so i can open this…

[MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAParticipant]

thanks for response
this attached file form optiwave sample folder ..they show that APD is better than PIN but actully not like this. i try to take data from suggested paper but not able to find result . always finding that PIN has better performance . can u help me further that which data help to improve APD sensivity compare to PIN.