Home Forums FDTD waveguiding

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    • #10667
      perveen akhter

      How good is FDTD for waveguiding compared to BPM?

    • #10878
      Tech Support

      In the simulation of optical waveguides, the methods FDTD and BPM are complimentary. Problems that BPM simulates well are not practical by FDTD. Problems that BPM cannot simulate are often possible in FDTD. BPM is for weakly guiding waveguides having mostly small refractive index contrasts. The problems are within the paraxial approximation. Waveguide splitting, tapering, and bending generally occur over distances too great for practical analysis by FDTD. Waveguides having high refractive index contrast can be made much shorter because of strongly guiding properties. Those problems are generally not paraxial and outside of the paraxial approximation used by BPM. On the other hand, those waveguides tend to be short, making analysis by FDTD practical.

    • #11702


      i work on the waveguide in optic non linear , can i use optiFDTD for this purpose !


Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.