Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
OptiSystem is a comprehensive software design suite that enables users to plan, test, and simulate optical links in the transmission layer of modern optical networks.
OptiSPICE is the first circuit design software for analysis of integrated circuits including interactions of optical and electronic components. It allows for the design and simulation of opto-electronic circuits at the transistor level, from laser drivers to transimpedance amplifiers, optical interconnects and electronic equalizers.
OptiFDTD is a powerful, highly integrated, and user friendly CAD environment that enables the design and simulation of advanced passive and non-linear photonic components.
OptiBPM is a comprehensive CAD environment used for the design of complex optical waveguides. Perform guiding, coupling, switching, splitting, multiplexing, and demultiplexing of optical signals in photonic devices.
The optimal design of a given optical communication system depends directly on the choice of fiber parameters. OptiFiber uses numerical mode solvers and other models specialized to fibers for calculating dispersion, losses, birefringence, and PMD.
Emerging as a de facto standard over the last decade, OptiGrating has delivered powerful and user friendly design software for modeling integrated and fiber optic devices that incorporate optical gratings.
Modal analysis is a pivotal component of modelling optical structures. OptiMode serves as a robust CAD platform for the design and modal analysis of waveguide structures.
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
OptiSystem is a comprehensive software design suite that enables users to plan, test, and simulate optical links in the transmission layer of modern optical networks.
OptiSPICE is the first circuit design software for analysis of integrated circuits including interactions of optical and electronic components. It allows for the design and simulation of opto-electronic circuits at the transistor level, from laser drivers to transimpedance amplifiers, optical interconnects and electronic equalizers.
OptiFDTD is a powerful, highly integrated, and user friendly CAD environment that enables the design and simulation of advanced passive and non-linear photonic components.
OptiBPM is a comprehensive CAD environment used for the design of complex optical waveguides. Perform guiding, coupling, switching, splitting, multiplexing, and demultiplexing of optical signals in photonic devices.
The optimal design of a given optical communication system depends directly on the choice of fiber parameters. OptiFiber uses numerical mode solvers and other models specialized to fibers for calculating dispersion, losses, birefringence, and PMD.
Emerging as a de facto standard over the last decade, OptiGrating has delivered powerful and user friendly design software for modeling integrated and fiber optic devices that incorporate optical gratings.
Modal analysis is a pivotal component of modelling optical structures. OptiMode serves as a robust CAD platform for the design and modal analysis of waveguide structures.
Please need some help. here i attached osd file of optisystem 13 by comparison of APD or PIN receiver sensitivity analysis. here I got
for APD received power -28.95 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
for PIN received power -35.45 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
As per my analysis in above result PIN Receiver showing good sensitivity then APD but most research artical shows APD has good sensitivity then PIN. please verify my statements.
Please need some help. here i attached osd file of optisystem 13 by comparison of APD or PIN receiver sensitivity analysis. here I got
for APD received power -28.95 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
for PIN received power -35.45 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
As per my analysis in above result PIN Receiver showing good sensitivity then APD but most research artical shows APD has good sensitivity then PIN. please verify my statements.
Please need some help. here i attached image of setup file of optisystem 13 by comparison of APD or PIN receiver sensitivity analysis. here I got
for APD received power -28.95 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
for PIN received power -35.45 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
As per my analysis in above result PIN Receiver showing good sensitivity then APD but most research artical shows APD has good sensitivity then PIN. please verify my statements.
Hi Mukesh,
The APD receiver needs lots of effects effect to be considered such as temperature, the incident intensity of light, because of avalanche multiplication i.e. carrier generation. whereas in the case of PIN the switching speed can be enhanced by a small minority carrier lifetime. so without seeing at the parameters that you have considered for the APD the exact reason can not be determined.
.
