- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
NURUL HAMIDA.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
May 22, 2017 at 5:28 am #43462
NURUL HAMIDAParticipantHi, all.
Have a good day everyone.I’m just simulating the RoF design to evaluate the eye diagram. But, the eye diagram was too bad. I suspect it because of the amplitude and bias value in the sine generator.
Down here is the design that I attached. Anyone who can help me to trace the problem -
May 25, 2017 at 4:52 pm #43639
Marc VerreaultParticipantGood day,
Your post doesn’t seem to include the attachment. Would it be possible to re-post with the attachment? Cheers.
-
May 30, 2017 at 12:22 am #43722
NURUL HAMIDAParticipantHi, Marc Verreault…
Since the file exceeded the maximum file size allowed, I’m just giving the snapshot of the eye diagram result. -
May 30, 2017 at 12:35 am #43725
NURUL HAMIDAParticipantHi, Marc Verreault…
Sorry for all the errors
Since the file exceeded the maximum file size allowed, I’m just giving the snapshot of the eye diagram result -
May 31, 2017 at 3:25 pm #43790
Marc VerreaultParticipantGood Nurul,
The eye diagram actually looks very good! The Q factor is 21 (very high). I wouldn’t change a thing in your design. Cheers
-
May 31, 2017 at 8:55 pm #43801
NURUL HAMIDAParticipantHi Marc Verreault
But I’m still confusing about the black rectangle in the up and down of the eye diagram.
-
June 1, 2017 at 10:14 am #43812
Marc VerreaultParticipantHi Nurul,
Yes, that does look strange at first view. If you reduce the number of samples do you still see the same? Cheers
-
June 1, 2017 at 9:50 pm #43838
NURUL HAMIDAParticipantHi, Marc…
When I decrease the number no samples, the result shows an improvement. But, I’m still don’t know how to pick the exact value of no of samples. Can you help me?
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.