- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 10 years, 3 months ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
OptiOmega is a collection of products specialized for photonic integrated circuit simulation. It automates the design flow for
generating compact models from device level simulations. The software package includes two solvers that can be used via
Python scripting: Vector Finite Difference (VFD) Mode Solver and Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Electromagnetic Solvers.
Download our 30-day Free Evaluations, lab assignments, and other freeware here.Â
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
OptiOmega is a collection of products specialized for photonic integrated circuit simulation. It automates the design flow for
generating compact models from device level simulations. The software package includes two solvers that can be used via
Python scripting: Vector Finite Difference (VFD) Mode Solver and Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Electromagnetic Solvers.
Download our 30-day Free Evaluations, lab assignments, and other freeware here.Â
Hi,
I am modelling curves in a rectangular waveguide using conformal mapping in OptiBPM but getting very strange results in the Power Overlap Integral and Relative Power data sets (which I believe to be how to check for bending losses). At first I thought it was a scripting issue and the variable wasn’t changing properly but I have since did the simulations manually, where I change the Radius of curvature at first 100s of microns at a time then nanometres at a time and found that the power loss fluctuated around the same value no matter what.
My first script from 400-1150 micron bends all gave almost no loss, my second script from 1150-2200 all gave a constant ~75% loss. I thought I was perhaps missing the range with which the critical bend loss occurs, so then I simulated 1156.1 which stayed at ~75% loss then 1156.01 then 1156.001 all stayed at ~75% loss. So I then re-simulated the 1150 RoC bend and found that it was now showing ~75% loss instead of the previous value of nearly zero loss.
I find this very confusing and feel like something in the simulation must not be set up correctly but I have no idea why this would cause the simulation results to change from run to run.
Thanks,
Paul.