- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 3 months ago by alistu.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
August 28, 2015 at 3:00 am #24149wei LiuParticipant
Dear all
I am confronted with another problem as followed:
I have successful constructed 2 OSD projects,and when i try to built a new one,error appears,two consecutive dialog box appears as attached,seems to tell me that the software could
not allocate engough memery for the project,and it sugget me change another folder,and i do as they suggeted,but still failed,please tell me what are the problem was and how could i solve it,thank you very much and have a good weekend! -
August 28, 2015 at 7:41 am #24163MHD NAParticipant
Hi Wei Liu; this problem had been done with me once, i stop some running programs in background and the problem had solved.
you can try that…….Good Luck-
September 6, 2015 at 3:30 am #24368wei LiuParticipant
thank you for the answers,my friend,i think i have find a way to avoid this happen,i just construct a new OSD file in the ‘file’menu,not construct directly on any of the pathway,ie,dest top,i do not know why,just solved,if you have other suggestions,please reply,thank you!
-
September 6, 2015 at 4:07 am #24371alistuParticipant
Hi Wei,
I am sorry I did not understand what you exactly did to overcome this problem. Can you explain it again please? I remember having this problem while I was using Matlab component to cosimulate optisystem and matlab, and I managed to solve it by optimizing my Matlab program so that they would need less memory. Thank you.
-
September 6, 2015 at 10:13 pm #24394wei LiuParticipant
hi,alistu,actually,what i did is very simple.I try to creat a new optisystem project in the desktop,but failed(as the picture i ever attached before),and now i do the job as followed:
1 start optisystem 7.0
2 click ‘file’menu
3 chose’new’
and a new project was created.although the problem is solved,but i still confused why,could you explain it?,thank you,my friend!
-
September 7, 2015 at 1:57 am #24398alistuParticipant
Thank you very much Wei for your further explanation. It’s the first time I’ve been hearing this and unfortunately I cannot explain it, since I am also confused. And the case I explained above was somehow different. But thank you for your explanation again.
-
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.