Home Forums GENERAL problems faced in OTDV

Viewing 19 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #34308
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      hi all,
      OTDV——> optical time domain visualizer

      in my system design i require to view the optical signal pulses at various positions in the transmission link..the positions
      are….
      1}after the MZM
      2}after the fiber of 100kms
      3} after the dispersion compensation unit…
      4} after amplification.

      but there are no. of bits bits missing in the initial stage or time

      what to do?

      with regards

    • #34309
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      hi all,

      i have now got the access to the software… i will post the pics of the regions 1, 2, 3 here with names of screen shot as per the position
      hope you all got my query…. replies with be appreciated if related to my problem.
      here are pics

      with regards

    • #34310
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      sory i missed the pics, here are these…

      Attachments:
    • #34477
      umer syed
      Participant

      hi aasif bashir dar,

      yeah looks like the the initial some bits are skiped in the in the 2.. and 3… picture… i think it is valid question…

      but in my view it may be due to the delay of the components as the single tramnsmission takes place along the channel…

      with regards

    • #34491
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      hi umar syed thanks for the reply..

      i my self belived at first that this might be due the delay of the of the individual components …but i am not sure…

      if it is like that … how can i get the the bits which i lost at first in optical time domain visulualizer….

      i want the same bits at the begining of of each of the otDV…

      looking ahead for sol… i am my self investigating for solution… when i would have i will also post here

      with regards

    • #34527
      Dr. Dhiman Kakati
      Participant

      Hi Aasif I am not clear about type of signal you are using at the input in electrical domain, it seems you are using non-polar rectangular pulse as from the output of the modulator, can not be sure. Please upload the design file if possible. Thanking you.

      Regards,
      Dhiman

    • #34531
      Atul Sharma
      Participant

      Hello Aasif Bashir Dar. Good Evening Greetings from my side.

      I checked the images you have shared. One thing stuck my mind about the waveforms displayed in the images that it may be because of either the dispersion down the feeder fiber link or the attenuation caused along the fiber channel. The third snapshot you have shared is very much distorted and it gives me an impression that it is because of the attenuation factor that your symbols are lost. Also check the power levels it goes down from 1m to 20 u.

      Regards
      Atul Sharma

    • #34535
      SAHIL SINGH
      Participant

      Hi Aasif

      As rightly mentioned by Dhiman Kakati i am also unable to figure the type of signal you are using at the input in electrical domain….Please try to upload the design file if possible. Thanking you.

      Regards
      Sahil Singh

    • #34540
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      hi dhimen and others…
      i am using the non return to zero modulation format for my design… the fiber has the dispersion of the 17ps/km/nm and dispersion slope of- 0.175 ps/km^2 nm…MZM modulator is used at the transmitter end and CW laser is used for optical input.

      i am very disturbed with the visualizer problem…i am looking for the solution…hope i will get it soon.

      with regards

      • #34542
        Dr. Dhiman Kakati
        Participant

        Hi Aasif,
        now alittelbit clear, I think you are using the MZM in ON-OFF keyoing mode (depending on the bias voltage inside the modulator) as seen from the output. Yes i agree you are using NRZ pulse generator, are you using any modulation scheme… Which modulation Scheme you are using..?

        Regads,
        Dhiman

      • #34553
        Atul Sharma
        Participant

        Hello Aasif bashir dar. Greetings.

        Thanks for sharing your system parameters. But to my understanding this problem should be in no way related to modulation or any such a factor. I think it is the disturbance in your system due which your signal is getting attenuated to this very level and as a result of which you are not getting the required bits. Try using a higher order filter like of the order of 5 or so and check for the results again. I hope that may work.

        Regards
        Atul Sharma

    • #34548
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      hi dhimen kakati,
      thanks for the reply

      i am using simple on-off keying

      with regards

    • #34564
      ZULKARNAIN
      Participant

      hi aasif bashir dar..
      i also think that it may be because of dispersion down the line or attenuation alomg the fiber.
      well i am not sure about your bit sequence whether it is random or user defined.If it is random then you can try with a user defined bit sequence. Hope it may resolve your problem.
      with regards.

    • #34570
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      hi zulkarnain,

      thanks for the reply…
      i beleive that it is not becoz of the fiber responses to optical pulses like you said dispersion, attenuation,or noinlinearity…..
      further more you have provide an ides of using user defined bit sequence instead of the random bit sequence gennerator…i hope it may work i will try it soon and will you know.

      with regards

    • #34571

      HELLO AASIF BASHIR..

      I guess this problem you had faced previously too.. And now i see the snapshots of the signals after three components you had mentioned..
      To some extent i think ATUL Sharma maybe right in saying that this problem is related to the disturbance in your system due which your signal is getting attenuated to this very level and as a result of which you are not getting the required bits… he maybe right here..you should try using a higher order filter like of the order of 5 or so and check for the results again. I hope that may work.

      Thanks & regards

    • #34582
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      hi zulkarnain,

      greetings…cheers

      it worked for me… i now used user defined sequence 0010111011 and bit are not missing…but i try many sequences until it worked for me.

      thank you very much for you ideas..
      with regards

      • #34583
        ZULKARNAIN
        Participant

        hi aasif bashir dar..
        You are always welcome sir.i am very glad to know that it worked for you.
        with regards

    • #34593
      Aabid Baba
      Participant

      Hello Aasif,
      So what was the exact problem you were facing and how did you overcome it. It will be worth mentioning if you are okay with it. you had recently posted about it and sorry couldn’t join the discussion but i would like to know what was the problem and the way you solved it. It may be helpful in future. I hope you won’t mind in sharing that.

      Regards

    • #34598
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      hi aabid baba

      both problem and solution are well explained in above comments… you just go through them

      problem was
      OTDV——> optical time domain visualizer

      in my system design i require to view the optical signal pulses at various positions in the transmission link OTDV——> optical time domain visualizer..the positions
      are….
      1}after the MZM 2}after the fiber of 100kms 3} after DCF and amplification.

      but there are no. of bits bits missing in the initial stage or time
      solution

      was suggested by the zulkarnain … and it worked for me… to use user defined bit sequence instead of the random bit sequence gennerator
      with regards

    • #34604
      SAHIL SINGH
      Participant

      Hi aasif Bashir,

      Thanks for the detailed explantion of the solution to your mentioned problem… I am also glad to know that your query has been solved…

      Regards
      Sahil Singh

    • #34612
      Aabid Baba
      Participant

      Hello Aasif,
      I did not go through the all comments but yeah i could see now what the main problem was and also the given solution. It may be helpful in future in one or the other way.

      @zulkarnain
      well done.

      Regards

    • #34703
      aasif bashir dar
      Participant

      yeah thanks all for this discussion ,,as it provided some sort of solution to me

    • #34715
      SAHIL SINGH
      Participant

      Hi aasif bashir,

      You are welcome and I am glad to know that you got some sort of the solution on the forum to your query… Also i want to correct you for one thing here that please use Mr Sahil instead of Dr Sahil… I hope it was unintentional..

      Regards
      Sahil Singh

Viewing 19 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.