- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by Damian Marek.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
May 20, 2015 at 9:08 am #20999Kiki KosmaParticipant
How can I draw a 3D triangular waveguide? i.e. a waveguide which is triangular in the xy plane and runs along the z direction.
Thanks! -
May 20, 2015 at 9:44 am #21002Damian MarekParticipant
Hey,
Create a new channel profile with the profile designer. Choose the first layer and then check the slanted walls box. You can choose the slant angle to be steep enough to meet in the middle creating a point. I made an isosceles triangle in the pictures attached.
Cheers
-
May 21, 2015 at 9:36 am #21027Kiki KosmaParticipant
Thank you! I have another question regarding the simulation parameters. What is the difference in the results of a simulation between a CW input field and a Gaussian modulated CW input field? What is the spectral width of the input fields in the two cases?
-
May 21, 2015 at 10:08 am #21028Damian MarekParticipant
I think you almost answered your own question.:) The spectral width of the CW input field is essentially zero, where as the spectral width of the Gaussian modulated CW input field can be quite large.
The half width of the spectral content is 1/T, the half width in time. For the default pulse, that corresponds to 54.8 THz half width at e^-0.5 the maximum. That means the bandwidth would be about 109 THz.
More information can be found here:
Cheers!
-
-
May 21, 2015 at 10:15 am #21029Kiki KosmaParticipant
So one does choose a Gaussian modulated input field in order to play with the spectral bandwidth right? What confuses me though is the bandwidth of the resulting spectra after the simulation: Why do I get such a broadband result when I run a simulation with a CW input source?
-
July 13, 2015 at 3:48 am #22363Kiki KosmaParticipant
Hello everyone, can anybody advise me on how one decides for how much time should a 3d simulation run in order to get some good results ? Thanks!
-
July 13, 2015 at 9:40 am #22380Damian MarekParticipant
This can depend on the design and can be particularly challenging if you have a cavity, which traps the light within it. For your typical, reflection/transmission simulation you want to run the simulation long enough that the field begins to reach steady state, which generally means the electromagnetic field begins to reach 0 everywhere. You can take snapshots to see the relative magnitude of the field and wait until it becomes below 1% of the initial excitation.
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.