- This topic has 2 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 8 years, 7 months ago by .
Viewing 2 reply threads
Viewing 2 reply threads
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
Download our 30-day Free Evaluations, lab assignments, and other freeware here.
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
Download our 30-day Free Evaluations, lab assignments, and other freeware here.
Hi, I have two questions regarding the attached simulation.
I have two links. One using the optical transmitter component and the second using a CW laser, Mach Zender modulator and PRBS.
First Question
Both systems are nominally the same. When I run a simulation I can get a measurement of both lins BER using the BER analyser. (the two results are different, I not worried that they are different). If I run the simulation a second time the link using the optical transmitter gives the same BER but the lin using the CW laser etc gives a different result. Why is this?
Second Question
Looking at the link using the optical transmitter I sweep the wavelength of the optical transmitter from 1511nm to 1591nm. If I polt the BER versus the wavelength the BER gradually improves. Can anyone give me a reason why. (The optical fibre loss is set to 0.2dB for all wavelengths) See next post for graph.
Graph of wavelength versus BER
I figured out the second question, it was the fibre dispersion.
Can anyone from the optisystem team answer the first part.
Notifications