Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
OptiSystem is a comprehensive software design suite that enables users to plan, test, and simulate optical links in the transmission layer of modern optical networks.
OptiSPICE is the first circuit design software for analysis of integrated circuits including interactions of optical and electronic components. It allows for the design and simulation of opto-electronic circuits at the transistor level, from laser drivers to transimpedance amplifiers, optical interconnects and electronic equalizers.
OptiFDTD is a powerful, highly integrated, and user friendly CAD environment that enables the design and simulation of advanced passive and non-linear photonic components.
OptiBPM is a comprehensive CAD environment used for the design of complex optical waveguides. Perform guiding, coupling, switching, splitting, multiplexing, and demultiplexing of optical signals in photonic devices.
The optimal design of a given optical communication system depends directly on the choice of fiber parameters. OptiFiber uses numerical mode solvers and other models specialized to fibers for calculating dispersion, losses, birefringence, and PMD.
Emerging as a de facto standard over the last decade, OptiGrating has delivered powerful and user friendly design software for modeling integrated and fiber optic devices that incorporate optical gratings.
Modal analysis is a pivotal component of modelling optical structures. OptiMode serves as a robust CAD platform for the design and modal analysis of waveguide structures.
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
OptiSystem is a comprehensive software design suite that enables users to plan, test, and simulate optical links in the transmission layer of modern optical networks.
OptiSPICE is the first circuit design software for analysis of integrated circuits including interactions of optical and electronic components. It allows for the design and simulation of opto-electronic circuits at the transistor level, from laser drivers to transimpedance amplifiers, optical interconnects and electronic equalizers.
OptiFDTD is a powerful, highly integrated, and user friendly CAD environment that enables the design and simulation of advanced passive and non-linear photonic components.
OptiBPM is a comprehensive CAD environment used for the design of complex optical waveguides. Perform guiding, coupling, switching, splitting, multiplexing, and demultiplexing of optical signals in photonic devices.
The optimal design of a given optical communication system depends directly on the choice of fiber parameters. OptiFiber uses numerical mode solvers and other models specialized to fibers for calculating dispersion, losses, birefringence, and PMD.
Emerging as a de facto standard over the last decade, OptiGrating has delivered powerful and user friendly design software for modeling integrated and fiber optic devices that incorporate optical gratings.
Modal analysis is a pivotal component of modelling optical structures. OptiMode serves as a robust CAD platform for the design and modal analysis of waveguide structures.
Both dispersion compensation techniques (FBG and DCF) has three schemes (pre, post, and mixed). In terms of Q-factor and Bit error rate, which one of them is better. A lot of papers discussed this issue and the had different results even most of them uses OptiSystem.
I know there are different papers and do not always agree on which solution is the best. I think the reason is that it depends on the particular configuration…for example for high launch power nonlinearities have a role together with dispersion, and this changes the picture.
If I remember well, Optisystem examples show that mixed is the best solution, correct?
Hello Taha Ali
According to your question about performance of DCF and FBG,i am agree with Alessandro that it vary for some systems and configuration.There are lot of research articles regarding this particular topic however different results shown about best performance of DCF and FBG.According to my knowledge,DCF has around 93% efficient to reduce pulse width of dispersed signal while FBG have 73% efficiency. Also DCF is costlier than FBG. I have given link of ↓ optiwave dispersion compensation example and a link of paper describing pulse width reduction efficiency of FBG and DCF
I just want to add that according to optisystem dispersion compensation example symmetric compensation came out to be the best but at the higher powers post dispersion compensation performs better.
DCF compensation is used periodically and folows the rule L1D1+L2D2=0 where L1 is length of the transmitting fiber having dispersion D1 and L2 is length of compensating DCF and D2 its dispersion.. obviouslt Q factor depends on system configuration and optimization used but DCF is used for long distance transmission systems.
Welcome Taha Ali
Its our pleasure to help and share knowledge with other members,Hope you got your answer from above discussion.Do not forget to share ideas and knowledge with all the other forum participants.Best of luck for your future research work.
.
