- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 6 months ago by .
Viewing 3 reply threads
Viewing 3 reply threads
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
Download our 30-day Free Evaluations, lab assignments, and other freeware here.Â
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
Download our 30-day Free Evaluations, lab assignments, and other freeware here.Â
I try to compensate second and third order fiber dispersion in the frequency domain, the frequency domain filter works well at 25 Gbaud/s and gives results close to compensation using DCF but when increasing symbol rate to 50 Gbaud/s there is a clear difference between compensation using DSP and DCF, is there a problem in this method?
Hi Fouad, When I ran your simulation, I encountered an error stating that it couldn’t load(‘D:\qpsk data\I_comp1’). If there is another Matlab file that you have not attached, please attach it. Otherwise. could you give an explanation about this? Thank you.
I attached these files, that load In-phase and q-phase components from Matlab to optisystem also the binary data, QPSK symbols for calculating BER if needed and you may need (Inphase_comp_tx_for_Q-factor)that contains In-phase component with no biasing or amplification (i.e. constellation points at [-1+1j 1+1j -1-1j 1-1j]). you could use these files and change the paths or use your own QPSK TX and RX but you will need the last two matlab component(specially matlab component 2) to compensate the dispersion.
attached here a file comparing the performance of DSP and DCF, the difference in the performance can be seen from the constellation visualizer.
i don’t know where is the problem, the frequency domain filter just multiply the signal by the conjugate of {exp(j*[(beta2*omega^2/2)+(beta3*omega^3/6)]), beta2,3: second and third order dispersion, omega: angular frequency} to compensate dispersion.