Home Forums SYSTEM Chirped Gaussian Pulse Model

Chirped Gaussian Pulse Model

Profile Photo
(joined April 2022)
Participant

Hi all,
I have a doubt regarding the implementation of the “Optical Gaussian Pulse Generator” and the “Optical Fiber” components. I am using OptiSystem 14 (the version my university provides).

The first doubt is about the definition of “Chirp” in the “Analysis” part of the “Optical Time Domain Visualizer”. If we denote a generic complex signal as

s(t) = A * exp(+1j*phi),

where A>0 is the module and phi is the phase, it seems to me that by “Chirp” it is meant the quantity

d(phi)/dt

This is a common definition, but sometimes a sign ‘-‘ is used in front of the derivative. That is why I ask.
Anyway, doing some simulations with signals I generated (with the “Measured Optical Pulse” component), it seems to me that the chirp definition used in OptiSystem is d(phi)/dt.

Fixed that, I am wondering which is the definition of the Gaussian pulse implemented in the “Optical Gaussian Pulse Generator”. In particular, I am not sure about the “Chirp factor” which can be set for the component. Again, the Help of the component does not indicate a model for the Gaussian pulse where such “Chirp factor” is present. I thought that the standard expression for the chirped pulse had been used (as reported in eq5 of your tutorial <a href=”https://optiwave.com/resources/applications-resources/optical-system-effects-of-group-velocity-dispersion-gvd-on-gaussian-pulse-propagation/”>here</a&gt;). However, if eq5 was implemented, the chirp should be

-C*t/T0^2

ie, a decreasing quantity with time t. However, if one checks with a “Optical Time Domain Visualizer” the chirp of a gaussian pulse generated with “Optical Gaussian Pulse Generator” with chirp factor C=2, the chirp results to be increasing with time.
To me this indicates that a different definition (from eq5 of the above tutorial) has been used for the gaussian pulse. In particular, I would guess that a sign ‘-‘ has been used in front of the chirp factor ‘C’ in such equation.
Am I right? If not, why?

The second issue is with the propagation equation implemented by the “Optical fiber” component, assuming only group-velocity dispersion (GVD) is present, ie, attenuation, third-order dispersion, XPM and all other distorting effects are off. In the Help of the component is indicated that the equation implemented by the fiber is, in this case,

dE/dz = -j * beta2/2 * d2E/dt2, (model 1)

where beta2 is the second-order derivative of beta wrt frequency omega, and d2E/dt2 is the second-order derivative of the field amplitude E wrt time t.

However, I did a couple of simulations which brought me to believe that the actual equation implemented by the component is (in this case)

dE/dz = +j * beta2/2 * d2E/dt2 (model 2)

One of the simulations I did, consists in generating an unchirped gaussian pulse (ie, C=0), selecting beta2<0, and checking which is the chirp of the pulse after propagating in the fiber for a certain distance z. For a gaussian pulse the analytic expression for the output field when only GVD is present is known. The theory (ie, the mentioned analytic expression) tells us that, if (model 1) has been implemented, the chirp should be increasing with time. On the opposite, if (model 2) has been implemented, the chirp should be decreasing with time.
Doing such simulation with OptiSystem, I see from the “Optical Time Domain Visualizer” that the chirp is decreasing with time. Therefore, it seems to me that (model 2) is implemented by the “Optical fiber” component, instead of the (model 1) indicated in the Help.
Am I right? If not, why?

Thanks in advance to anyone who will answer!

Responses (1):

    • #70850
      Profile Photo
      Paolo Carniello
      Participant

      Hi all,
      I have a doubt regarding the implementation of the “Optical Gaussian Pulse Generator” and the “Optical Fiber” components. I am using OptiSystem 14 (the version my university provides).

      The first doubt is about the definition of “Chirp” in the “Analysis” part of the “Optical Time Domain Visualizer”. If we denote a generic complex signal as

      s(t) = A * exp(+1j*phi),

      where A>0 is the module and phi is the phase, it seems to me that by “Chirp” it is meant the quantity

      d(phi)/dt

      This is a common definition, but sometimes a sign ‘-‘ is used in front of the derivative. That is why I ask.
      Anyway, doing some simulations with signals I generated (with the “Measured Optical Pulse” component), it seems to me that the chirp definition used in OptiSystem is d(phi)/dt.

      Fixed that, I am wondering which is the definition of the Gaussian pulse implemented in the “Optical Gaussian Pulse Generator”. In particular, I am not sure about the “Chirp factor” which can be set for the component. Again, the Help of the component does not indicate a model for the Gaussian pulse where such “Chirp factor” is present. I thought that the standard expression for the chirped pulse had been used (as reported in eq5 of your tutorial <a href=”https://optiwave.com/resources/applications-resources/optical-system-effects-of-group-velocity-dispersion-gvd-on-gaussian-pulse-propagation/”>here</a&gt;). However, if eq5 was implemented, the chirp should be

      -C*t/T0^2

      ie, a decreasing quantity with time t. However, if one checks with a “Optical Time Domain Visualizer” the chirp of a gaussian pulse generated with “Optical Gaussian Pulse Generator” with chirp factor C=2, the chirp results to be increasing with time.
      To me this indicates that a different definition (from eq5 of the above tutorial) has been used for the gaussian pulse. In particular, I would guess that a sign ‘-‘ has been used in front of the chirp factor ‘C’ in such equation.
      Am I right? If not, why?

      The second issue is with the propagation equation implemented by the “Optical fiber” component, assuming only group-velocity dispersion (GVD) is present, ie, attenuation, third-order dispersion, XPM and all other distorting effects are off. In the Help of the component is indicated that the equation implemented by the fiber is, in this case,

      dE/dz = -j * beta2/2 * d2E/dt2, (model 1)

      where beta2 is the second-order derivative of beta wrt frequency omega, and d2E/dt2 is the second-order derivative of the field amplitude E wrt time t.

      However, I did a couple of simulations which brought me to believe that the actual equation implemented by the component is (in this case)

      dE/dz = +j * beta2/2 * d2E/dt2 (model 2)

      One of the simulations I did, consists in generating an unchirped gaussian pulse (ie, C=0), selecting beta2<0, and checking which is the chirp of the pulse after propagating in the fiber for a certain distance z. For a gaussian pulse the analytic expression for the output field when only GVD is present is known. The theory (ie, the mentioned analytic expression) tells us that, if (model 1) has been implemented, the chirp should be increasing with time. On the opposite, if (model 2) has been implemented, the chirp should be decreasing with time.
      Doing such simulation with OptiSystem, I see from the “Optical Time Domain Visualizer” that the chirp is decreasing with time. Therefore, it seems to me that (model 2) is implemented by the “Optical fiber” component, instead of the (model 1) indicated in the Help.
      Am I right? If not, why?

      Thanks in advance to anyone who will answer!

    • #70961
      Profile Photo
      Ahmad Atieh
      Moderator

      This post is a duplicate

Login You must be logged in to reply to this topic.