- This topic has 1 voice and 0 replies.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
OptiOmega is a collection of products specialized for photonic integrated circuit simulation. It automates the design flow for
generating compact models from device level simulations. The software package includes two solvers that can be used via
Python scripting: Vector Finite Difference (VFD) Mode Solver and Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Electromagnetic Solvers.
Download our 30-day Free Evaluations, lab assignments, and other freeware here.Â
Optiwave software can be used in different industries and applications, including Fiber Optic Communication, Sensing, Pharma/Bio, Military & Satcom, Test & Measurement, Fundamental Research, Solar Panels, Components / Devices, etc..
OptiOmega is a collection of products specialized for photonic integrated circuit simulation. It automates the design flow for
generating compact models from device level simulations. The software package includes two solvers that can be used via
Python scripting: Vector Finite Difference (VFD) Mode Solver and Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Electromagnetic Solvers.
Download our 30-day Free Evaluations, lab assignments, and other freeware here.Â
Hello everyone,
In the first part of a project I am modeling a butt coupling between two single mode fibers in 2D et 3D.
The first part is really simple, I observe the coupling efficiency versus the gap length between the two fibers. This is a well known configuration, there are even analytical solutions for Gaussian beams.
The problem is that in this simple case the results of analytical solutions and those obtained with BPM are very different: for a gap of 150µm, the calculations give me 30% of efficiency whereas OptiBPM is around 60%.
In the analyzer I look at the “power in output waveguides”.
Do you know why these results could be so different?
Thanks for your help.