Forum Replies Created

    #49673
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Hello,

    Based on the structure and the refractive index contrast you will have you are correct to post your question in the OptiFDTD forum group as FDTD is the appropriate application for this type of device. We have a 30 day evaluation that you can download and see how it works for your application.

    The evaluations are available under the Downloads menu at the top of the page.

    Scott

    #49647
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Hello Jayeshkumar,

    Can you please email info@optiwave.com with your serial number so that the support team can help you with this problem?

    Scott

    #49579
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Ruoyu,

    I am not certain what you are asking, you would have to change the design accordingly.

    Scott

    #49578
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    James,

    I forwarded a set of designs to you as a demonstration of the product capabilities. This is accomplished through the use of the user-defined function profile.

    Scott

    #49538
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Chandra,

    You will need to provide more information in order for me to help you with this as I was able to load up and simulate your design. Can you please provide me with the following information:
    – What version of the software are you using?
    – Screenshots of any windows open while simulating, particularly ones showing progress.

    Regards,
    Scott

    #49520
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Hello Ruoyu,

    The AWG cannot be modeled in one single simulation due to distance and curvature of the waveguides. Each segment must be modeled with the phase and amplitude from the previous section used in the input plane information. There should be another sample AWG_Star.bpd which is the output star coupler from your example generated from that script. Please review the notes in that example to understand what is being done.

    Scott

    #49513
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Hello Lewis,

    Your image attachment is not visible. Can you please create a zip file with the image as well as your design file and we can take a look?

    Scott

    #49492
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Hardik,

    You are going to need to provide further details in order for us to help you. What geometry are you working with? Which of our products are you using?

    Scott

    #49491
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    You have not attached an updated design file. I already provided feedback on the one you attached earlier. Do keep in mind that without having a maintenance license, I am assuming you are using the 32-bit, my support is necessarily limited to helping with issues in the product. We are not able to provide design assistance.

    Please provide specifics on the issue you have, i.e. how is your results not the desired results, and I can see what I can do.

    Scott

    #49466
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Please see my response at https://optiwave.com/forums/topic/subwavelength-hole-simulation/

    • This reply was modified 3 months, 1 week ago by  Scott Newman.
    • This reply was modified 3 months, 1 week ago by  Eric Tubby. Reason: Link fix
    #49465
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Hello Alex,

    One thing to note is that with the Fourier transforms on a the Gaussian pulse, the further you go away from the central wavelength the less accurate your results are. Your source is 0.55 um and you are running Fourier transforms from 0.3 to 1.1 um. With the 64-bit product I only find the value going over one if I move away from the central wavelength.

    Based on the information you have made available it would appear that you are dealing with one of two situations:
    1. You are running into a bug that is specific to the 32-bit free product which is out-dated and not currently maintained.
    2. You are looking at values that are to far from your central wavelength based on your pulse width.

    Scott

    #49464
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    The reason you are not getting access to the full 4 Gb is possibly a limitation within your specific operating system and without heavy diagnostics I would not be able to tell you.

    Based on Windows 10 documentation a 64-bit product can access anywhere between 128 Gb and 6 Tb depending on the version of windows you are using. Most Windows 10 systems our users are running are either Home (128 Gb) or Pro (2 Tb).

    Scott

    #49462
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    First let me just clarify your statement that you have 10 Gb of free memory. Are you referring to RAM or space on your hard drive? I know you are referring to memory (RAM) but I just want to ensure we are all on the same page.

    Second you are in fact using a 32 bit product where 32-bit systems are in fact limited to 4 Gb of memory allocation regardless of how much you have available on your machine. On some systems this maximum limit can be even lower depending on how the operating system handles memory allocation. It would appear you are hitting the limit of a 32-bit system. Might I suggest you try the 30-day evaluation of the 64-bit product?

    #49421
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Hardik,

    I strongly recommend that you watch the introductory webinars and look through some of the examples that come with your installation. There are a number of issues and unfortunately I do not have the resources to do one on one training.

    Answers to your questions:
    1. You do not need a profile for each layer the one profile is sufficient, it should be the cross section of your profile. I am not certain what you mean by stubs but your design has one waveguide and the design in the paper is a cross pattern. Use the linear waveguides and place them where you see the features in the paper.

    2. In the design you attached you have a z-directed input plane and not an x. Additionally you have it set to Gaussian not modal for the transverse profile. Do keep in mind that the input plane must cross the waveguide in order to calculate a mode.

    Something for you to be aware of:
    1. Your resolution (set in the 3D simulations item within the project browser) is far too high. The auto setting is based on your source wavelength to ensure it is stable. However, you have feature sizes (in your case layer thicknesses) as low as 0.01. Your resolution must be such that the structure is properly discretized.

    Scott

    #49414
    Profile Photo
    Scott Newman
    Participant

    Timothy,

    Agreed, not ideal but it should allow you to continue with your design. You could also check out the current version of the product through a 30-day evaluation.

    Scott Newman